Couture 101

Monday, September 11, 2006 by

Just to shake things up a bit and because last week's challenge fostered a wide diversity of strong opinions, we thought we'd take a minute to look at the concept of couture and what it means.

Now, make no mistake, we're fabulous, but we thought we'd ask a true fashion bitch for her opinion, so we contacted our good friend George at Rafe New York and he graciously offered his take:

"Haute Couture to the public at large is oft about the outlandish. People who only watch the couture shows in the media but don't deal with the aspects of fashion that include (or strive to be like, as it may) this highest form of the fashion industry's craft only see the garish elements that make the couture shows exactly that: SHOWS. People in the industry - whether editors, fellow designers or clients - can mentally edit what is shown on the runway to reveal what the couture was originally (and for some, still is) about: made-to-order clothing customers will actually wear, created with the highest levels of craftsmanship, from construction to embellishment. So high, in fact, that the couturiers design on a level of difficulty that matches or continually tests the metier of its craftsmen, and makes these clothes unfit for any sort of mass production. The show aspects are there to entertain, inspire and spur imagination more than to be taken literally. "Crazy fashion" does not equal Couture.

If you watch the challenge again, you'll see that Tim Gunn made certain to say that the contestants were to imbue their gowns with couture elements, because really, none of these designers are actually qualified to make couture, since you have to have an atelier, be certified by the Chambre, etc., etc.

Pnut's entry, from concept to pattern to execution, was the closest (though not without missteps, in my estimation) to a couture gown, because his design pushed the limits of the dressmaking craft. Laura's, while pretty, was a simulacrum of past couture work, more of an ode to couture than actual attempt at it. Michael's ruched gown could have qualified from its concept, but since Couture is about craftmanship as much as it is about design to showcase the craft, it fell flat (had Malan been in the competition, he might have had a chance at excelling in this challenge). Uli's gown was beautiful, but when you consider that she has done most, if not all, of the elements on her gown in past challenges, it certainly
didn't push the
envelope enough to qualify as a stretch into the land of couture and is perhaps why it didn't get the highest marks from the judges.

Kayne's work, well - since Haute Couture represents the highest form of the dressmaking craft - it needs to reflect the highest taste levels as well (although to be fair, there are some tacky couture designs in existence). Couture can be about the simplest suit, just constructed impeccably, so much so that you can often wear a couture dress inside out because even the lining is equally beautiful. Kayne took the route of creating a show dress because in his mind it seemed Haute Couture is about show clothing, but he just tried to show too much. As Coco Chanel once said, "Elegance is refusal." Had he edited himself and focused on one or two aspects of his design instead of this "everything and the kitchen sink" attitude, he might have had a chance. At least it fit extremely well. But that just makes him a good dressmaker, not necessarily a great designer. Yet."

To our surprise and delight, the fabulous Rafe himself offered his opinion:

"Haute Couture as far as I can remember from my FIT days and my general exposure from working within the fashion industry means "High Fashion," but practically it means "made to order".

The French take couture very seriously. The have an association for couturiers that presides over the coming and goings of the shows, who can show, when to show, etc. They have rules as to what merits a "maison" to be considered entry to the French couture shows. I seem to recall you have to show a minimum of 30 looks and must employ a minimum number of "petite mains" (little hands or seamstresses). What makes couture...couture? Since the premise is that the garment is made to order, that means the process will require several steps, fittings with the client, first with the muslin and then a 2nd with the actual fabric mostly "basted" (lightly stitched) on to the underpinnings, etc. A couture garment will usually involve some embroidery from the best embroidery company Lesage, the best silks from Bucol, lots of beadwork and hand stitching; sleeves have to be set in by hand; lapels have to be sewn on horsehair canvas not pressed/fused like most ready-to-wear garments; linings will be silk, not acetate; and so on. The final outcome should be a perfect fit and exactly as you envisioned it. Couture designers show twice a year to clients and then these clients will make appointments and select which designs from the show they liked and will make necessary adjustments or different color choices. This is why it is couture because it is made for you, just for you and exactly as you want it.

The whole idea that a couture garment can be made in 2 days, as Project Runway suggested, is ridiculous but it was an attempt to address a wider audience and I suppose it makes good TV to see those guys fret and sweat. Unfortunately, most of the designs ended up looking like mother of the bride or prom dresses on acid, especially Kayne's. Poor guy, he can't help himself. Everything but the kitchen sink was on that monster of a gown. Oy!"

Thanks, fabulous bitches! We'll be back in a little bit to rip Uli's gown off her model and stomp on it (figuratively, of course).

28 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thank you, bitches. Fabulous!
BTW, I LOVE the black dress. It's gorgeous. I could only dream of owning something Haute Couture.

Anonymous said...

The process of Haute Couture is always a mystery to me. This has definitely educated me a lot...thanx for the post. This make an interesting read.

Anonymous said...

Great information from Rafe. The world could get along very well without couture but what a boring place it would be! Reading this brings to mind how much I enjoyed watching The House of Elliot on PBS so long ago and Style With Elsa Klench. Fiction and for real, these shows gave you the feeling of what the couture world is really about off the cat walk. My guilty pleasure now is Signe Chanel on Sundance Channel. Those seamstresses are a French hoot!

Brian

Anonymous said...

Excellent information . I really apprecaite you guys going the distance for your readers.

(I still don't like Jeffrey or his "gyno office exam gown" dress)

Gigi said...

What a wonderful way to start my day!

BigAssBelle said...

oh, i love being educated by world class bitches ;-) thank you, thank you.

but after reading this and examining closely the garments shown in this post, i've come up with a theory.

glorious clothes are glorious when someone fabulous says so. the same garment coming from a non-fabulous designer is deemed horrid by the fabulous ones simply because it's a non-fabulous designer.

still smarting from darling kayne's dismissal as one who lacks taste, i have to say that i don't see a lot of difference between his 14 kt confection and some of those others in the photos. . . . i've looked at malandrino's collection and she is apparently a fabulous one, many of her garments look like those that have been auf'd on the Runway.

BigAss "Fabulous Because I Say So" Belle ;-)

Anonymous said...

Great primer on couture. I wonder who couture clients are these days? The most well known and visible one was Nan Kempner who passed away not too long ago (the mind boggles at the collection she must have had). It's not red carpet skags, they get it all for free. I think true couture clients have always been a little discreet about it. What does Lauren Bacall say in How to Marry a Millionaire when describing William Powell... "My guy's real class, never mentions his wealth, just refers to it."

Anonymous said...

Thank you for that informative post. Until now, I have alway thought "couture" simply meant really high-end and expensive. Shows what my classless Southern ass knows.

And I second the question about who buys the stuff? Who are these people? And do the design houses really sell enough of it to recoup their investment?

Lydia said...

Great lesson in couture. I am a little sad that Malan (who I adored, for some reason) wasn't around to do this challenge. I think he could have pulled it off. *sigh*

Anonymous said...

You guys are the best! Not only do I get a daily bellylaugh, but I learn something, too.

There is no end to your fabulousness!

stmkent said...

Agreed, Lydia. If anyone could have come out of this challenge without their dress looking jacked up, I bet it would have been Malan.

katiecoo said...

Fabulous informative entry George, Rafe and Boys! Thank you! And thanks for that nod to Malan..I can only imagine what he would have brought to this challenge...with Vincent and Angela in there all that time, it still leaves me scratching my head.

Then again, he IS showing at Fashion Week and somehow I doubt we'll see either of the aforementioned two there.

Sewhat? said...

The acid green outfit? I swear I saw it in the last San Francisco Gay Freedom Day Parade, right after the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence.

Bill said...

PRGayBoys, George & Rafe,

Thanks for the Couture lesson. I was grossly underinformed. Humor, community, education - what doesn't this blog provide?

After checking out all your links yesterday, I was inspired to teach myself how to add them to my own blog. Of course, I listed yours as a favorite link.

Anonymous said...

Thank you! I had a vague idea of what couture was, but this really put it in perspective. They really should have had a little 30 second primer included in this epidode that summed it up, at least for the viewers' sake.

Embeedubya said...

According to Vincent (the only one who knows how to design, he says), couture means poorly-fitting, ill-conceived, put together with glue, Angela-worthy craft-crap flower stuck on the back, ugly frigging dress! Glad to have the record set straight.

Anonymous said...

How ridiculous is a country whose fashion industry is regulated by the government? Do you go to fashion prison if you claim your designs to be couture when they're not?

Embeedubya said...

I thought the PRGayboys WERE the American fashion gendarmes!

eric3000 said...

Amy asked,

"And do the design houses really sell enough of it to recoup their investment?"

Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the fashion houses actually lose a ton of money on their couture lines. They're just used as a marketing tool for the ready-to-wear lines.

Anonymous said...

thanks for that, I was quite confused about that issue :D

eric3000 said...

Thanks for the great lesson on couture!

I always thought it was so wierd when Carson Kressley would refer to the off-the-rack clothes for his Queer-Eye victims as "couture." I think he just wants people to have more respect for clothing but he may be adding to the confusion.

Anonymous said...

eric3000 nailed it right on the head. One of the reasons that the shows have become such a spectacle is to generate buzz for lesser priced offerings from the Houses. It used to be that the Couture (of which, officially, there are only less than 20 registered houses) helped promote sales for the perfumes, which were a way that the masses could buy into the fantasy for a fraction of the price. Now it seems to promote handbags and accessories more than anything, although the parfum business is still very important.

Last I read, there are about 200 Couture clients in the entire world, and 60% of them are Americans. Not much, considering that they used to sell entire collections to a customer at a time...

Georgene said...

Is it down to only 200 clients world wide?

I think couture shows go in the advertising expense column on the books. And it does work, you only have to look at Dior's figures, as well as Vuitton, to see that a hot controversial designer and/or show can do wonders for perfumes and accessories.

The French have a concept of the 'patrimoine' - a cultural heritage that needs to be protected. Couture embroiderers, shoemakers, silk flower artisans, etc are finally being recognized as the national treasure that they are. Once a house closes down and the knowledge is dispersed, that heritage is lost. You can read about it in a book, or look at it in a musuem, but that won't allow you to follow in a tradition and create from knowledge passed down to you.

Armande Gogel, my couture draping teacher in Paris, said "Long after you have forgotten my words, you will remember my gestures". Her theory was that you had to know how to do everything yourself in order to tell everyone else what to do. You had to be able to feel the collar going in to the neckline, and the sleeve going into the armhole. How are you going to get that experience without working someone who knows?

Long live La Couture! I hope it can stay alive somehow.

Anonymous said...

Thank you, Rafe. This challenge was a joke - and an insult to the thousands of unknown craftspeople who have spent their lives creating true haute couture.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the lesson on couture. It's always been one of those fuzzy phrased words. But, now I see things a bit clearer.

Is there couture for men?

Brian in KY

Rafe Totengco said...

On behalf of George and myself, you're welcome everyone! We're not experts by far but we're happy to share what we know about the subject. And thanks for the nice reception on our 'guest-stint' on Project Rungay!

And yes, georgene, it's quite sad how the craft is slowly dying away. I wish that I could use even a fraction of the techniques in my own product, but it's just not practical for a mass produced line like mine.

And Brian in KY, I don't recall Paris having a tradition of couture for men. However, the equivalent is bespoke clothing /suiting for men in Great Britain. I don't think there's a higher form of made-to-measure men's clothing than that in the world.

Now back to the regular program of gay snark (all in good fun, of course)!

Anonymous said...

BTW Rafe Fierce shoes in InStyle June '06 with the agate stones. I lived for them all summer.

Rafe Totengco said...

Thanks Suzanne - I think they're still on sale at our store - at over 70% off! (it IS Fall now,after all. Okay, shameless plug, I know.)